Kun

I thought the Canon for "Kun" was "grab/grasp" and that a "shadow" was "un-grab"-able". Isn't that straight from the game? Why change it from the original?

Maakrindah

Kun

I thought the Canon for "Kun" was "grab/grasp" and that a "shadow" was "un-grab"-able". Isn't that straight from the game? Why change it from the original?

There is an invented word kuz "to take" that was formerly kun. It was edited to kuz to avoid conflict with the canon kun "light." Kun has never meant "to grab/grasp/take" in canon.

Boziik

Could Brazen be added to the definition?

Genun

Add "express" to the definitions

Lahk

Add definition "chide"

Hadrozaal

Can this be a verb and a noun?

Aaverin-Mindaas

Is there not a more efficient way to say "the study of" than adding mindaas at the end? I'm sure there is a way to make this less wordy and more fluid

Aavgolz

Take "magnetic" out of the list of definitions since this is a noun, not an adjective

@Boziik, I've added an English-Dovahzul entry for "brazen" that points to boziik.

@Genun, "express" in what sense? At its core, genun means "to make visible."

@Lahk, added chide. This word should also be edited to something else, since ah should not be used in the middle of a syllable this way and laak means "to snore."

@Hadrozaal, this should be a noun only. Use hadroz as the verb "to braid (weave)".

@Aaverin-Mindaas, the convention is hahse-, as in hahsegol "geology (mind of the earth"). However, hahseaaverin doesn't work so well, so it is aaverin-mindaas in this case.

@Aavgolz, it is both, in the same way that "metal" is both a noun and adjective.

Aavgolz

Perhaps "Lodestone" should be added to the definition. If not, I would like to Author the word for it.

Maakrindah

Aavgolz

Perhaps "Lodestone" should be added to the definition. If not, I would like to Author the word for it.

That'll work, and is perhaps even a better translation of aavgolz than "magnet."

Can there be a way to list that in the contents of the word since it usually only says "noun" or "adjective"?

-maar

The only problem I see with this being self reflexive is the fact that Fahdonmaar still means "friendship" yet many other words with "-ship" end with Ein/Dein.

@Ahmuldein I see where you are coming from, but I believe '-maar' when it signifies '-hood' or '-ship' (instead of '-self') is a still a reflexive suffix, because it signifies a group reflexiveness (ie how individuals in a group relate to each other.) Hence brotherhood cannot exist if there is only one brother and friendship cannot occur with only one person. These should not be confused with singular reflexive suffixes in english which imply what one does to himself / herself and furthermore should not be confused with non-reflexive words that share a suffix in english. Words like 'apprenticeship' only need one apprentice and do not imply group or self reflexiveness. One does not apprentice oneself and an apprentice does not apprentice others. I believe that in Dovahzul (and i could be wrong) reflexive '-ship' and '-hood' (along with '-self') are signified by "-maar" while non-reflexive "-ship" and "-hood" are signified by "-ein" or "-gein".

@Ahmuldein I believe the next print dictionary will have the new parts of speech that will clarify which words are multiple parts of speech in english. For instance, we do not have a part of speech in english that denotes whether a verb is also a noun, but there is a linguistic part of speech that does denote these words separately from words that are only nouns or only verbs.