Along with Vulonsinak, perhaps a change of definition to include more than just clouds, but rather encompass any object, like trees, leaves, or windows.
Word Revision Thread
 Maakrindah May 4, 2015 |
@Liis I think that's an excellent idea. Those are other ways that this light phenominon naturally occurs. I do want to maintain the idea that these are beams of light which are visible from the sides, although I am not certain how to best concisely phrase all of the applicable definition descriptions for the words. |
by Maakrindah
May 4, 2015
@Liis I think that's an excellent idea. Those are other ways that this light phenominon naturally occurs. I do want to maintain the idea that these are beams of light which are visible from the sides, although I am not certain how to best concisely phrase all of the applicable definition descriptions for the words.
|
Maakrindah May 4, 2015 |
@Liis - Yes, or humidity, etc., and I definitely agree with your specific additions. I was just wondering if there is an all inclusive phrasing or if all the examples should be cited. I personally am in favor of all examples being included in the definition, but I am slightly concerned about the overall length and flow of the definition. Apart from that, I just wanted to note that 'vulonsinak' and 'sulsinak' are meant to specifically describe visible beams. |
by Maakrindah
May 4, 2015
@Liis - Yes, or humidity, etc., and I definitely agree with your specific additions. I was just wondering if there is an all inclusive phrasing or if all the examples should be cited. I personally am in favor of all examples being included in the definition, but I am slightly concerned about the overall length and flow of the definition. Apart from that, I just wanted to note that 'vulonsinak' and 'sulsinak' are meant to specifically describe visible beams.
|
Maakrindah May 5, 2015 |
@Liis - I propose this definition for Sulsinak: "Visible beams of sunlight which pass through/around trees, clouds and other photoporous objects." The same for 'Vulonsinak', but with 'Moonlight'. |
by Maakrindah
May 5, 2015
@Liis - I propose this definition for Sulsinak: "Visible beams of sunlight which pass through/around trees, clouds and other photoporous objects." The same for 'Vulonsinak', but with 'Moonlight'.
|
Maakrindah May 5, 2015 |
@ Liis- 'photoporous' - It's a compound word with the base word "porous" and the prefix "Photo-". It follows the grammar rules of English for compound words. 'Porous' indicates that something has pores or openings. 'Photo-' indicates a relationship to light such as in photograph and photosynthesis. The prefix in this instance implies permeability, but to say "photopermeable" would describe something that is translucent or transparent. |
by Maakrindah
May 5, 2015
@ Liis- 'photoporous' - It's a compound word with the base word "porous" and the prefix "Photo-". It follows the grammar rules of English for compound words. 'Porous' indicates that something has pores or openings. 'Photo-' indicates a relationship to light such as in photograph and photosynthesis. The prefix in this instance implies permeability, but to say "photopermeable" would describe something that is translucent or transparent.
|
Maakrindah May 5, 2015 |
@Liis - "RAXZUTH" - While 'Sovut' would technically work, I think a little disambiguation by making 'Raxzuth' both a noun and verb would be beneficial. I think your idea would be excellent. |
by Maakrindah
May 5, 2015
@Liis - "RAXZUTH" - While 'Sovut' would technically work, I think a little disambiguation by making 'Raxzuth' both a noun and verb would be beneficial. I think your idea would be excellent.
 Liis Administrator May 5, 2015 |
@Maakrindah, I mean yeah, I knew what it meant, but didn't know if the word could be used since it's not recorded. :p I'm all for its usage though. |
by Liis
May 5, 2015
@Maakrindah,
I mean yeah, I knew what it meant, but didn't know if the word could be used since it's not recorded. :p I'm all for its usage though.|
Dezonikso May 5, 2015 |
Add "hither" to translation |
by Dezonikso
May 5, 2015
Add "hither" to translation
|
Maakrindah May 5, 2015 |
@Liis I see your point; most English dictionaries would not have entries for this word. If we can find a better word, then awesome. What did you think of the rest of the proposed definition? |
by Maakrindah
May 5, 2015
@Liis I see your point; most English dictionaries would not have entries for this word. If we can find a better word, then awesome. What did you think of the rest of the proposed definition?
|
Maakrindah May 5, 2015 |
@Vriilomdren I totally agree. |
by Maakrindah
May 5, 2015
@Vriilomdren I totally agree.
This thread is more than 6 months old and is no longer open to new posts. If you have a topic you want to discuss, consider starting a new thread. Contact the administrator for assistance if you are the author of this thread.
